<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emotional Architecture?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruairi</title>
		<link>http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-88288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruairi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-88288</guid>
		<description>Please do :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do <img src='http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-88287</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-88287</guid>
		<description>dam strait, thats sick. im a big fan of Xefirotarch, but never seen that before.

It is a less scientifically rigerous version of my genotecture theory.

I will get around to sending you some text and images at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dam strait, thats sick. im a big fan of Xefirotarch, but never seen that before.</p>
<p>It is a less scientifically rigerous version of my genotecture theory.</p>
<p>I will get around to sending you some text and images at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruairi</title>
		<link>http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-87816</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruairi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-87816</guid>
		<description>Hey Paul

Donna Haraways Cyborg Manifesto was class reading material on my degree. Taught to us by a full on feminist which was kind of a shock for a class made up predominantly of guys.

Cheers for the links, I thought you may like this thing I came across earlier paul

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQukt36Gew0&#038;eurl=http://robotic-ecologies.blogspot.com/2007/10/los-angeles-2106.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paul</p>
<p>Donna Haraways Cyborg Manifesto was class reading material on my degree. Taught to us by a full on feminist which was kind of a shock for a class made up predominantly of guys.</p>
<p>Cheers for the links, I thought you may like this thing I came across earlier paul</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQukt36Gew0&#038;eurl=http://robotic-ecologies.blogspot.com/2007/10/los-angeles-2106.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQukt36Gew0&#038;eurl=http://robotic-ecologies.blogspot.com/2007/10/los-angeles-2106.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-86841</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/emotional-architecture.html#comment-86841</guid>
		<description>if you have not, read this (Donna Haraways cyborg manifesto):

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html

A guy recently postulated in his doctrate paper that it will one day be socially acceptable to marry a robot (about 2050):

http://www.livescience.com/technology/071012-robot-marriage.html

Any way AI is so 2006, actual life synthesis is where its at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange

This will be the most significant leap in human epistimology ever. A birth of a new paradigm, seriously significant stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you have not, read this (Donna Haraways cyborg manifesto):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html</a></p>
<p>A guy recently postulated in his doctrate paper that it will one day be socially acceptable to marry a robot (about 2050):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.livescience.com/technology/071012-robot-marriage.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.livescience.com/technology/071012-robot-marriage.html</a></p>
<p>Any way AI is so 2006, actual life synthesis is where its at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange</a></p>
<p>This will be the most significant leap in human epistimology ever. A birth of a new paradigm, seriously significant stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
