Gulbenkian
June 10th, 2009
I just got back from Lisbon where I saw, amongst other things, the Gulbenkian Museum. Ok… it has very little to do with interactive architecture, but I was so inspired by it that I decided to write about it anyway.
The thing that really struck me walking through the museum was the balance throughout. I don’t mean in a the-building-is-almost-falling-down-but-not kinda way: I’m referring to an unusually great combination of art and architecture, and how it felt.

The museum building was designed by a team made up of the architects Ruy Jervis d’Athouguia, Pedro Cid and Alberto Pessoa and hints (rather strongly) at inspiration from Mies van der Rohe. The building’s minimalist concrete form sits in a beautifully landscaped park, concealing bunker-like yet welcoming rooms of marble and wood floors and ceilings. Blinds obscuring the view to outside through floor to ceiling windows reduce the outside image almost to paintings.

Inside, one of the most amazing art collections I’ve ever seen is actually given the space it deserves. The minimalist architecture is the perfect backdrop for an intricately crafted collection which includes everything from Egyptian treasures to Chinese and Japanese tapestries and ceramics, to Rembrants, Rubens’, and Monets. I’m not an art historian, by any stretch of the imagination, but clearly only the best was good enough for this collector.


That one man managed to gather this collection is unbelievable. That it has all ended up together in this setting is even more amazing. In a time when I’m thinking more and more about interactive and reactive installations, and the opportunities an increasing number of permanent commissions will bring, 2 hours walking through the Gulbenkian has reminded me in the significance of balance. Although completely static, save the variation of the small amount of natural light entering the museum, I would dare describe the resulting feeling of being in this museum as immersive. The combination of light, minimal architecture, a subtle connection to the surrounding landscape and an extremely detailed collection of artworks, drew everyone in a way I’ve rarely experienced. I could go on about this forever but I won’t – I guess I just look forward to seeing more and more interactive installations that find this balance too.
Entry Filed under: Architecture,Scuplture/Installation
3 Comments Add your own
1. Sergio Garcez | June 10th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
I would suggest that the balance you speak of is also reflected in the landscape design by Gonçalo Ribeiro Teles. Some of my fondest childhood memories are form those gardens:)
2. Ben | June 26th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Good point. I was thinking I should have written more about that. The gardens were amazing, and definately an important part of the balance I was talking about.
Wish I grew up there
3. Mehul Bhatt | September 26th, 2010 at 3:18 pm
hi,
Its nice to see this blog. I was at the Museum in July and I also share the sentiment. The architecture and the landscape seemed to blend together so neatly that it felt as if the building once in a while turns in to a garden and vice-versa. The internal gallery level continuity was also amazing.
I liked the interiors and the structure so much that we even decided to use the Gulbenkian with a case study that we are working on.
I wonder if there exist architecture-oriented folks out there who could / or already have described the patterns and features they see in language…as computer scientists, we would be keen to seen how they translate into design
cheers, Mehul
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed